0 Items

Supreme Court Told to Uphold 20-Week Ban to Protect Down Syndrome Babies From Abortion

Posted by Administrator on 11/20/2013 to Down syndrome

Lead counsel Bioethics Defense Fund filed a “friend of the court” brief in the U.S. Supreme Court making a novel legal argument addressing disability-selective abortion.

The amicus brief was filed on behalf of the Jérôme Lejeune Foundation USA, Saving Downs, and the International Down Syndrome Coalition – non-profit organizations that, among other things, provide support and advocacy to benefit families receiving a prenatal diagnosis of Down syndrome and other disabilities.

The amicus brief was filed in support of a 2012 Arizona law that limits abortion after twenty weeks gestational age, except when necessary to avoid death or serious health risk to the mother. Physicians challenging the law confirm that the vast majority of disability-selective abortions occur after twenty weeks gestation, and amici organizations report that this is due to fear, lack of supportive information, and often pressure from misguided medical professionals.

The law reflects Arizona’s interest in limiting abortion of pain-capable unborn children, and in protecting the health of women from the exponentially increased risks of late-term abortion.

This disability rights amicus brief highlights Arizona’s additional interests in protecting the integrity and ethics of the medical profession from engaging in eugenic decision making, and by disfavoring discriminatory abortion and even proposals for infanticide of unborn children identified as having a disability, in accord with the Americans with Disabilities Act and other federal law.

The brief explains that the U.S. Supreme Court’s abortion jurisprudence has not and should not protect disability-selective abortions.

The brief explains that the Planned Parenthood v. Casey opinion affirming Roe v. Wadewas premised on a so-called right to decide “whether to bear or beget a child,” but that the U.S. Ninth Circuit panel erroneously broadened that opinion to give constitutional protection to the decision whether to bear or selectively abort this particular child based on a prenatal diagnosis of disability.

The dignity of a child does not change with a diagnosis of Down syndrome, cystic fibrosis, spina bifida, or any other health condition, as recognized by numerous U.N. resolutions.

The amicus brief was filed in support of a U.S. Supreme Court petition in the case ofHorne v. Isaacson, No. 13-402 by lead counsel Nikolas T. Nikas along with Dorinda C. Bordlee of theBioethics Defense Fund, D. John Sauer and associates from the law firm of Clark & Sauer, andCatherine W. Short of Life Legal Defense Foundation.

Story Written by Dorinda Bordlee



Betsy Baker
Date: 11/21/2013
FIRST OFF, these are babies with Down syndrome NOT Down syndrome babies. Please please get the order correct or we shall have to refer to your column as Poorly Worded suggestions. sheesh. My daughter is a HUMAN first and her diagnosis is secondary to who she is.
Date: 2/22/2017
Wonderful news!:) Cotntanulariogs to both you and Ben – she is just divine. I can’t wait until we are able to both of our little angels in the petit club We can’t wait to meet baby Emma. xxx Sharon, Adam and Charlotte.
Date: 3/9/2017
None can doubt the vearticy of this article. http://xeppxgfv.com [url=http://aphknyrppz.com]aphknyrppz[/url] [link=http://bcirofzvg.com]bcirofzvg[/link]
Date: 3/10/2017
That's an expert answer to an inretesting question http://vdqycihqkt.com [url=http://avqgpwv.com]avqgpwv[/url] [link=http://aupbbks.com]aupbbks[/link]
Date: 4/14/2017
Thinking like that is really impisserve http://rayzipt.com [url=http://wghbmgjyagp.com]wghbmgjyagp[/url] [link=http://zpxsaoso.com]zpxsaoso[/link]
Date: 4/14/2017
Thinking like that is really impisserve http://rayzipt.com [url=http://wghbmgjyagp.com]wghbmgjyagp[/url] [link=http://zpxsaoso.com]zpxsaoso[/link]
Date: 4/15/2017
There is a critical shortage of infitmarove articles like this. http://uprnop.com [url=http://sqlibxcbt.com]sqlibxcbt[/url] [link=http://bnbnrcdrg.com]bnbnrcdrg[/link]
Elisa Brown
Date: 5/7/2017
This is a message to the Supreme Court Told to Uphold 20-Week Ban to Protect Down Syndrome Babies From Abortion webmaster. Your website is missing out on at least 300 visitors per day. Our traffic system will dramatically increase your traffic to your website: http://priscilarodrigues.com.br/url/v - We offer 500 free targeted visitors during our free trial period and we offer up to 30,000 targeted visitors per month. Hope this helps :)
Andrea Gibson
Date: 10/12/2017
I discovered your Supreme Court Told to Uphold 20-Week Ban to Protect Down Syndrome Babies From Abortion page and noticed you could have a lot more traffic. I have found that the key to running a website is making sure the visitors you are getting are interested in your subject matter. We can send you targeted traffic and we let you try it for free. Get over 1,000 targeted visitors per day to your website. Start your free trial: http://segundaibc.com.br/go/1i Unsubscribe here: http://pcgroup.com.uy/2a
Date: 10/27/2017
Did you just create your new Facebook page? Do you want your page to look a little more "established"? I found a service that can help you with that. They can send organic and 100% real likes and followers to your social pages and you can try before you buy with their free trial. Their service is completely safe and they send all likes to your page naturally and over time so nobody will suspect that you bought them. Try the service for free here: http://url.euqueroserummacaco.com/ikn Unsubscribe here: http://corta.co/eXu

Add Comment