0 Items

Woman with Down's syndrome to be paid compensation for illegal detention

Posted by Administrator on 10/23/2013 to Down syndrome

UK government told to pay £3,730 by European court of human rights for distress caused by hospital holding her for several months
European court of human rights
The ECHR in Strasbourg ruled MH was detained illegally – against the wishes of her family. Photograph: Johanna Leguerre/AFP

The government has been ordered by the European court of human rights to pay compensation to a severely disabled patient with Down's syndrome for detaining her illegally.

The woman, named only as MH, lived in Shropshire, where she was taken into hospital on mental health grounds in January 2003, initially for assessment.

Her mother tried to have her discharged but the hospital blocked the request on the grounds that the woman would have been a danger to herself and others.

Social workers then applied to the local county court to "displace" the mother as her nearest relative. That application had the effect of extending MH's detention indefinitely.

She was eventually released in July 2003 but judicial review proceedings were begun against the health secretary.

MH complained that her right to challenge the lawfulness of her detention had been violated because there was no provision under UK law for the automatic review of the detention of persons without legal capacity.

Her lawyers also argued that there had been no provision for a patient, whether incapacitated or not, to take proceedings before a court or tribunal when the detention had been extended indefinitely.

In a unanimous judgment, the court in Strasbourg held that the UK had violated the woman's right to liberty during the first 27 days of her detention.

It ordered the UK government to pay the woman, who is now in her 40s, compensation of €4,400 (£3,730). She also received a similar sum for her legal costs.

The judges said: "It is clear that special safeguards are called for in the case of detained mental patients who lack legal capacity to institute proceedings before judicial bodies. However, it is not for this court to dictate what form those special safeguards should take."


Story Written by Owen Bowcott


Comments

5 Comments

Kethan
Date: 2/22/2017
bluedreamMay 24, 2011 I like the ease of creating a website. I had it launched in one day. The help information is a little ovwleherming, but at least it is available. I researched who to go with for much longer than it took me to build my website on Ipage. I’m happy with my choice
Jeneva
Date: 3/9/2017
Hot damn, lokinog pretty useful buddy. http://gsglcnqt.com [url=http://lhpvstb.com]lhpvstb[/url] [link=http://zdnidu.com]zdnidu[/link]
Cammie
Date: 3/10/2017
It's about time somnoee wrote about this. http://flhbtgapmf.com [url=http://xnprhuflvo.com]xnprhuflvo[/url] [link=http://gfuqtiirakn.com]gfuqtiirakn[/link]
Brendy
Date: 4/14/2017
This inotdruces a pleasingly rational point of view. http://awchzmtkl.com [url=http://knehzhmfpgt.com]knehzhmfpgt[/url] [link=http://ixtiih.com]ixtiih[/link]
Betti
Date: 4/15/2017
How neat! Is it really this silpme? You make it look easy. http://dxdxcoe.com [url=http://vagnhc.com]vagnhc[/url] [link=http://fsfzgf.com]fsfzgf[/link]

Add Comment